Sökning: "legal argument"

Visar resultat 1 - 5 av 60 avhandlingar innehållade orden legal argument.

  1. 1. Justitia et Prudentia. Rättsbildning genom rättstillämpning - Svea hovrätt och testamentsmålen 1640-1690

    Författare :Elsa Trolle Önnerfors; Juridiska institutionen; []
    Nyckelord :SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP; SOCIAL SCIENCES; law of will and testament; law of succession; property law; early modern Sweden; appeal court; legal formation; legal practice; Legal history; legal argumentation;

    Sammanfattning : The purpose of this doctoral dissertation is to investigate how legal issues relating to the law of wills were handled in the clash between the demands on the legal infrastructure of late 17th century Sweden on the one hand, and the insufficiencies of the medieval Swedish legislation on the other. The focus of the study is the law of wills, and how the absence of written law was handled by the appeal courts, primarily in the first royal court of appeal in Sweden, the Svea Court of Appeal. LÄS MER

  3. 2. Armed intervention, pursuing legitimacy and the pragmatic use of legal argument

    Författare :Olof Beckman; Raoul Wallenberg institutet för mänskliga rättigheter och humanitär rätt; []
    Nyckelord :SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP; SOCIAL SCIENCES; armed intervention; international law; United Nations; public international law; state practise; self-defense; legal argument; human rights; Folkrätt;

    Sammanfattning : This study examines how States use legal arguments in cases of armed intervention and how this usage can influence the development of international law. The objective is to contribute to the understanding of the law on armed intervention by conducting a study of how States actually use legal arguments to justify or condemn armed interventions in actual cases. LÄS MER

  4. 3. Reasoning by Analogy - A Study on Analogy-Based Arguments in Law

    Författare :David Reidhav; Juridiska institutionen; []
    Nyckelord :SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP; SOCIAL SCIENCES; Reasoning by analogy; legal argumentation; legal methodology; formal justice; stare decisis; precedent; analogy; proportional analogy; similarity; dimensional property; comparative similarity; arguments from analogy; closure rule; jurisprudence; allmän rättslära;

    Sammanfattning : This doctoral dissertation is a study on analogy-based arguments in law. Its overarching aim is to clarify reasoning by analogy in law. A model is proposed for analyzing and assessing arguments from analogy in law. LÄS MER

  5. 4. "Allt detta lovar jag" : löftesmomentet vid prästvigning, med särskild hänsyn till debatten om prästeden vid kyrkomötena 1868–1893 och dess senare följder

    Författare :Ingvar Bengtsson; Centrum för teologi och religionsvetenskap; []
    Nyckelord :HUMANIORA; HUMANITIES; ordination; promise; affirmation; pledge; vow; oath; vigsellöfte; maktdelegation; edens religiösa inslag; argument; kyrkomöte; prästvigning; förbindelse; försäkran; ed; löfte; General Synod; religious elements in the oath; delegation of power; matrimonial pledge;

    Sammanfattning : The purpose of this study is to describe and analyse changes in the pledge element of the ordination in the Church of Sweden. The transition in 1893 from a clerical oath to an affirmation will be particularly in focus and its causes and effects identified. LÄS MER

  7. 5. Högsta domstolen och enhetligheten : Om enhetlighetsargumentets betydelse för prejudikatprocessen

    Författare :Marie Jarnesand; Henrik Bellander; Anna Kaldal; Dan Frände; Stockholms universitet; []
    Nyckelord :SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP; SOCIAL SCIENCES; Supreme Court; precedent; stare decisis; uniformity; procedural law; Prejudikatprocess; enhetlighet; Högsta domstolen; HD; prejudikatbildning; processrätt; instansordningen; Rättsvetenskap med inriktning mot processrätt; Legal Science; specialisation in Procedural Law;

    Sammanfattning : Argumentation of uniformity with respect to the Supreme Court has a long tradition and appears in the procedural law context in a variety of ways. It is widely used as a motive for introducing or arguing against changes in the process order, as well as an argument to justify that the Supreme Court must and should act in a certain way. LÄS MER