Sökning: "Raoul Wallenberg institutet för mänskliga rättigheter och humanitär rätt"
Hittade 4 avhandlingar innehållade orden Raoul Wallenberg institutet för mänskliga rättigheter och humanitär rätt.
1. Themis v. Xiezhi: Assessing Judicial Independence in the People's Republic of China under International Human Rights Law
Sammanfattning : The first of three parts in this study elaborates on international human rights law and drawing on the most essential international instruments and jurisprudence, the criteria constituting judicial independence are distilled as a framework for assessment. The point of departure is that judicial independence is a necessary guarantee for the enjoyment of human rights rather than a privilege of judges. LÄS MER
2. In search of equality - A critical analysis of non-discrimination provisions in human rights treaties as they apply to migrant workers in Sub-Saharan Africa
Sammanfattning : The question that links all aspects of this thesis is how democratic nations implement international human rights law to protect their foreign migrant workers from unequal treatment. First, I examine international legal principles that are primarily focused on the principle of non-discrimination in international law. LÄS MER
3. Towards Human Rights 2.0? : A meta-theoretical analysis of the disruptions to human rights foundations by artificial intelligence
Sammanfattning : The use of artificial intelligence (‘AI’) is ubiquitous in society today. It has contributed towards advancements in diverse fields such as healthcare, transportation, public administration and in helping humanity to solve pressing challenges such as climate change. LÄS MER
4. Armed intervention, pursuing legitimacy and the pragmatic use of legal argument
Sammanfattning : This study examines how States use legal arguments in cases of armed intervention and how this usage can influence the development of international law. The objective is to contribute to the understanding of the law on armed intervention by conducting a study of how States actually use legal arguments to justify or condemn armed interventions in actual cases. LÄS MER