Sökning: "vagueness"
Visar resultat 6 - 10 av 33 avhandlingar innehållade ordet vagueness.
6. Levelling vagueness : a study of cultural diversity in an international project group
Sammanfattning : Imagine one Brit, one Dutch, two North Americans, one Spaniard and three Swedes setting up a joint international research project. Their areas of expertise vary: sociology, labour law and organisational theory. The scene is taking place in a hotel conference room in Uppsala. The North Americans are tired from the long trip and the jet-lag. LÄS MER
7. Behavioural Atmospheres and Vagueness in the Sharing of Urban Public Places
Sammanfattning : This thesis is an exploration of urban public places and social interactions understood as a sharing of place. Against the background of urbanization, migration, urban densification and new technologies, it can be assumed that our everyday ways of sharing place with one another are becoming more diversified. LÄS MER
8. "Das Eigentliche bleibt doch zurück." : Zum Problem der semantischen Unbestimmtheit am Beispiel von Theodor Fontanes Effi Briest
Sammanfattning : The purpose of this thesis is to describe and analyse the notion of indeterminacy in Theodor Fontane´s social novel Effi Briest. The study is interdisciplinary in that the notion of indeterminacy involves both literary scholarship and linguistics. LÄS MER
9. How It All Relates : Exploring the Space of Value Comparisons
Sammanfattning : This thesis explores whether the three standard value relations, “better than”, “worse than” and “equally as good”, exhaust the possibilities in which things can relate with respect to their value. Or more precisely, whether there are examples in which one of these relations is not instantiated. LÄS MER
10. Högsta domstolen och enhetligheten : Om enhetlighetsargumentets betydelse för prejudikatprocessen
Sammanfattning : Argumentation of uniformity with respect to the Supreme Court has a long tradition and appears in the procedural law context in a variety of ways. It is widely used as a motive for introducing or arguing against changes in the process order, as well as an argument to justify that the Supreme Court must and should act in a certain way. LÄS MER