Avancerad sökning
Hittade 3 avhandlingar som matchar ovanstående sökkriterier.
1. Högsta domstolen och enhetligheten : Om enhetlighetsargumentets betydelse för prejudikatprocessen
Sammanfattning : Argumentation of uniformity with respect to the Supreme Court has a long tradition and appears in the procedural law context in a variety of ways. It is widely used as a motive for introducing or arguing against changes in the process order, as well as an argument to justify that the Supreme Court must and should act in a certain way. LÄS MER
2. Reasoning by Analogy - A Study on Analogy-Based Arguments in Law
Sammanfattning : This doctoral dissertation is a study on analogy-based arguments in law. Its overarching aim is to clarify reasoning by analogy in law. A model is proposed for analyzing and assessing arguments from analogy in law. LÄS MER
3. FN:s säkerhetsråd i rättens tjänst – en studie av säkerhetsrådets ingripande under kap. VII i FN-stadgan för rätten till demokrati
Sammanfattning : The hypothesis of the present study is that the UN Security Council has a “quasi-judicial” capacity and is also able to function as a legislator. It is submitted that those roles are immanent in the Council’s mandate according to the UN Charter. LÄS MER