Sökning: "Olof Franck"

Hittade 4 avhandlingar innehållade orden Olof Franck.

  1. 1. Gastrointestinal Manifestations and Pathophysiological Mechanisms in Systemic Sclerosis

    Författare :Karin Franck-Larsson; Anders Rönnblom; Wilhelm Graf; Olof Hallböök; Uppsala universitet; []
    Nyckelord :MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES; MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP; MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP; MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES; Rheumatology; Reumatologi; Medicinsk vetenskap; Medical Science;

    Sammanfattning : Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare systemic, autoimmune disease characterized by vascular changes and fibrosis of the skin and internal organs. Patients with SSc more frequently than healthy controls reported upper gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, which was more abundant in the diffuse cutaneous form (dcSSc) of the disease than in the limited (lcSSc). LÄS MER

  2. 2. Gud och vardagsspråket : En religionsfilosofisk förutsättningsanalys

    Författare :Linda Fromm Wikström; Eberhard Herrmann; Karin Johannesson; Olof Franck; Uppsala universitet; []
    Nyckelord :HUMANITIES; HUMANIORA; HUMANIORA; HUMANITIES; Truth; reality; language; everyday language; conceptual scheme; metaphysical realism; anti-realism; metaphysical anti-realism; non-realism; God; presuppositions; transcendental argument; philosophy of religion; Donald Davidson; Michael P. Lynch; Eberhard Herrmann; Hilary Putnam; Alessandra Tanesini; Karin Johannesson; Erica Appelros.; Philosophy of religion; Religionsfilosofi; Philosophy of Religion; Religionsfilosofi;

    Sammanfattning : The main purpose of this dissertation is to answer the question of how one can understand the fact that we mean very different things when we say that God exists and when we say that chairs, mountains and trees exist, and that it is still a matter of existence. On the one hand it seems that we talk about the same thing when we say that something exists, irrespective of what it is, on the other hand it seems to be a question of very different things depending on what it is we are talking about as existing. LÄS MER

  3. 3. Att vara kroppssubjekt : Ett fenomenologiskt bidrag till feministisk teori och religionsfilosofi

    Författare :Kirsten Grønlien Zetterqvist; Olof Franck; Uppsala universitet; []
    Nyckelord :HUMANITIES; HUMANIORA; HUMANIORA; HUMANITIES; Religion; existential issues; phenomenology; giving birth; feminism; Sara Lidman’s: Lifsens rot; in-perspective; to be and to become; ontology; body subject; being; the meaning of life; Songe-Møller; Irigaray; Religionsvetenskap Teologi; existentiella frågor; fenomenologi; födelse; feminism; Sara Lidmans: Lifsens rot; i-perspektiv; är och blir; ontologi; kroppssubjekt; varat; livsmening; Songe-Møller; Irigaray; Eriksson; Butler; Beauvoir; Moi; Heidegger; Merleau-Ponty; Furberg; Holmberg; Religion Theology; Religionsvetenskap Teologi;

    Sammanfattning : In the complex of problems concerning women and fertility there is a focal point where central issues meet. The aim of this study is to draw up conceptions that can be of use to individual women who relate their fertile life situations to issues regarding the meaning of their lives. LÄS MER

  4. 4. Religion – evolutionens missfoster eller kärleksbarn? : Kognitionsvetenskaplig religionsforskning och dess relevans för religiösa trosföreställningars rationalitet

    Författare :Lotta Knutsson Bråkenhielm; Mikael Stenmark; Ulf Zackariasson; Olof Franck; Uppsala universitet; []
    Nyckelord :HUMANITIES; HUMANIORA; HUMANIORA; HUMANITIES; Cognitive Science of Religion; epistemic rationality; religious beliefs; cognitive mechanisms; intuitive and reflective reasoning; minimally counterintuitive concepts; hypersensitive agency detection device; theory of mind; religious naturalness; evolutionary byproduct; false positives; sensus divinitatis; causes and reasons; finite and infinite supernatural agency; Religionsfilosofi; Philosophy of Religion;

    Sammanfattning : This thesis is on Cognitive Science of Religion (CSR) and its relevance for the rationality of religious beliefs. An epistemical model for rationality is developed according to which: a person (or group of persons) is rational to hold a certain belief a) if this belief can be assumed to have been generated by one or more reliable cognitive mechanisms, b) applies whether or not she is aware of what these mechanisms are, but c) only as long as it does not exist or arise some reasons (defeaters) to question the belief; if they occur, she must d) reflect on it and find other reasons or grounds to hold the belief in question. LÄS MER