Local infiltration analgesia in knee and hip arthroplasty efficacy and safety

Sammanfattning: Local infiltration analgesia (LIA) is a new multimodal wound infiltration method. It has attracted growing interest in recent years and is widely used all over the world for treating postoperative pain after knee and hip arthroplasty. This method is based on systematic infiltration of a mixture of ropivacaine, a long acting local anesthetic, ketorolac, a cyclooxygenase inhibitor (NSAID), and adrenalin around all structures subject to surgical trauma inknee and hip arthroplasty. Two patient cohorts of 40 patients scheduled for elective total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and 15 patients scheduled for total hip arthroplasty (THA) contributed to the work presented in this thesis. In a randomized trial the efficacy of LIA in TKA with regard to pain at rest and upon movement was compared to femoral block. Both methods result in a high quality pain relief and similar morphine consumption, but fewer patients in the LIA group reported pain of 7/10 on any occasion during the 24 h monitoring period (paper I). In the same patient cohort the maximal total plasma concentration of ropivacaine was below the established toxic threshold for most patients although a few reached potentially toxic concentrations of 1.4-1.7 mg/L. The time to maximal detected plasma concentration was around 4-6 h after release of tourniquet in TKA (paper II). All patients in the THA cohort were subjected to the routine LIA protocol. In these patients both the total and unbound plasma concentration of ropivacaine was determined. The concentration was below the established toxic threshold. As ropivacaine binds to a-1 acid glycoprotein(AAG) we assessed the possibility that increased AAG may decrease the unbound concentration of ropivacaine. A40 % increase in AAG was detected during the first 24 h after surgery, however the fraction of unbound ropivacaine remained the same. There was a trend towards increased C max of ropivacaine with increasing age and decreasing creatinine clearance but the statistical power was too low to draw any conclusion (paper III). Administration of 30mg ketorolac according to the LIA protocol both in TKA and THA resulted in a similar Cmax as previously reported after 10 mg intramuscular ketorolac (paper II, paper IV). Neither age, nor body weight or BMI, nor creatinine clearance, correlates to maximal ketorolac plasma concentration or total exposure to ketorolac (AUC) (paper IV). In conclusion, LIA provides good postoperative analgesia which is similar to femoral block after total knee arthroplasty. The plasma concentration of ropivacaine seems to be below toxic levels in most TKA patients. The unbound plasma concentration of ropivcaine in THA seems to be below the toxic level. The use of ketorolac in LIA may not be safer than other routes of administration, and similar restrictions should be applied in patients at risk of developing side effects.