Effective cooperative scheduling of task-parallel applications on multiprogrammed parallel architectures

Sammanfattning: Emerging architecture designs include tens of processing cores on a single chip die; it is believed that the number of cores will reach the hundreds in not so many years from now. However, most common parallel workloads cannot fully utilize such systems. They expose fluctuating parallelism, and do not scale up indefinitely as there is usually a point after which synchronization costs outweigh the gains of parallelism. The combination of these issues suggests that large-scale systems will be either multiprogrammed or have their unneeded resources powered off.Multiprogramming leads to hardware resource contention and as a result application performance degradation, even when there are enough resources, due to negative share effects and increased bus traffic. Most often this degradation is quite unbalanced between co-runners, as some applications dominate the hardware over others. Current Operating Systems blindly provide applications with access to as many resources they ask for. This leads to over-committing the system with too many threads, memory contention and increased bus traffic. Due to the inability of the application to have any insight on system-wide resource demands, most parallel workloads will create as many threads as there are available cores. If every co-running application does the same, the system ends up with threads $N$ times the amount of cores. Threads then need to time-share cores, so the continuous context-switching and cache line evictions generate considerable overhead.This thesis proposes a novel solution across all software layers that achieves throughput optimization and uniform performance degradation of co-running applications. Through a novel fully automated approach (DVS and Palirria), task-parallel applications can accurately quantify their available parallelism online, generating a meaningful metric as parallelism feedback to the Operating System. A second component in the Operating System scheduler (Pond) uses such feedback from all co-runners to effectively partition available resources.The proposed two-level scheduling scheme ultimately achieves having each co-runner degrade its performance by the same factor, relative to how it would execute with unrestricted isolated access to the same hardware. We call this fair scheduling, departing from the traditional notion of equal opportunity which causes uneven degradation, with some experiments showing at least one application degrading its performance 10 times less than its co-runners.