Structures in complex systems : Playing dice with networks and books

Sammanfattning: Complex systems are neither perfectly regular nor completely random. They consist of a multitude of players who, in many cases, playtogether in a way that makes their combined strength greater than the sum of their individual achievements. It is often very effective to represent these systems as networks where the actual connections between the players take on a crucial role.Networks exist all around us and are an important part of our world, from the protein machinery inside our cells to social interactions and man-madecommunication systems. Many of these systems have developed over a long period of time and are constantly undergoing changes driven by complicated microscopic events. These events are often too complicated for us to accurately resolve, making the world seem random and unpredictable. There are however ways of using this unpredictability in our favor by replacing the true events by much simpler stochastic rules giving effectively the same outcome. This allows us to capture the macroscopic behavior of the system, to extract important information about the dynamics of the system and learn about the reason for what we observe. Statistical mechanics gives the tools to deal with such large systems driven by underlying random processes under various external constraints, much like how intracellular networks are driven by random mutations under the constraint of natural selection.This similarity makes it interesting to combine the two and to apply some of the tools provided by statistical mechanics on biological systems.In this thesis, several null models are presented, with this view point in mind, to capture and explain different types of structural properties of real biological networks. The most recent major transition in evolution is the development of language, both spoken and written. This thesis also brings up the subject of quantitative linguistics from the eyes of a physicist, here called linguaphysics. Also in this case the data is analyzed with an assumption of an underlying randomness. It is shown that some statistical properties of books, previously thought to be universal, turn out to exhibit author specific size dependencies. A meta book theory is put forward which explains this dependency by describing the writing of a text as pulling a section out of a huge, individual, abstract mother book.