Engineering Competitive and Query-Optimal Minimal-Adaptive Randomized Group Testing Strategies

Sammanfattning: Suppose that given is a collection of $n$ elements where $d$ of them are emph{defective}. We can query an arbitrarily chosen subset of elements which returns Yes if the subset contains at least one defective and No if the subset is free of defectives. The problem of group testing is to identify the defectives with a minimum number of such queries. By the information-theoretic lower bound at least $log_2 inom {n}{d} approx dlog_2 (frac{n}{d}) approx dlog_2 n$ queries are needed. Using adaptive group testing, i.e., asking one query at a time, the lower bound can be easily achieved. However, strategies are preferred that work in a fixed small number of stages, where queries in a stage are asked in parallel. A group testing strategy is called emph{competitive} if it works for completely unknown $d$ and requires only $O(dlog_2 n)$ queries. Usually competitive group testing is based on sequential queries. We have shown that actually competitive group testing with expected $O(dlog_2 n)$ queries is possible in only $2$ or $3$ stages. Then we have focused on minimizing the hidden constant factor in the query number and proposed a systematic approach for this purpose. Another main result is related to the design of query-optimal and minimal-adaptive strategies. We have shown that a $2$-stage randomized strategy with prescribed success probability can asymptotically achieve the information-theoretic lower bound for $d ll n$ and growing much slower than $n$. Similarly, we can approach the entropy lower bound in $4$ stages when $d=o(n)$.